ISO27001 compared to other platforms
  • Compliance Management
  • 20th Jan 2026
  • 1 min read

ISO 27001 Compared to Other Information Security Standards: What’s the Difference?

Gabriel Few-Wiegratz
  • Written by
Gabriel Few-Wiegratz
View my profile on
In Short...

TLDR: 4 Key Takeaways

  • ISO 27001 is the only certifiable ISMS standard in the comparison, designed to manage information security risk across the organisation through governance, controls and continual improvement.

  • Guidance frameworks and schemes serve different roles, with ISO 27002 and NIST CSF supporting control design and maturity, Cyber Essentials providing UK baseline assurance, and SOC 2 offering auditor-led attestation rather than certification.

  • The right standard depends on market and customer expectations, with UK and global supply chains often prioritising ISO 27001, UK public sector buyers requesting Cyber Essentials, and US driven SaaS customers favouring SOC 2 reports.

  • Many organisations use multiple standards together, mapping controls across frameworks and using a central GRC platform to reduce duplication, reuse evidence and maintain audit readiness across ISO 27001, SOC 2 and other requirements.

A clear understanding of how these standards differ helps organisations choose the right mix for their size, maturity and markets. ISO 27001 provides a structured, internationally recognised foundation, while guidance frameworks and assurance schemes complement it by supporting control design, baseline assurance and customer-specific reporting without replacing the need for a formal ISMS.
Introduction

ISO 27001 is often mentioned alongside ISO 27002, the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, Cyber Essentials and SOC 2, but each serves a different purpose.

 

This article explains how ISO/IEC 27001 differs from other information security standards, what makes it a certifiable Information Security Management System (ISMS), and how it fits alongside guidance frameworks, baseline schemes and assurance reports.

What Does It Mean to Compare Information Security Standards?

Comparing information security standards means looking at what each one is designed to do, who it is for and what kind of assurance it provides. Some, like ISO/IEC 27001, are certifiable management system standards. Others, such as ISO/IEC 27002 and the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, are guidance frameworks. Cyber Essentials is a UK assurance scheme, while SOC 2 is an attestation report used mainly in US-driven markets.

 

A useful comparison looks at type, scope, assurance level and implementation effort.

ISO 27001 vs ISO 27002

ISO 27001 is a certifiable management system standard, while ISO 27002 is a supporting guidance standard that explains information security controls in more detail. ISO 27001 sets the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an ISMS. ISO 27002 describes how individual controls can be interpreted and applied.

 

In practice, organisations that pursue ISO 27001 certification use ISO 27002 as a reference when choosing and designing controls. ISO 27001 includes Annex A, which lists control themes. ISO 27002 expands on these with guidance and examples. You can use ISO 27002 guidance without becoming certified, but certification is always against ISO 27001, not ISO 27002.

ISO 27001 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework

ISO 27001 is an international, certifiable management system standard, whereas the NIST Cybersecurity Framework is a voluntary guidance framework published by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology. ISO 27001 focuses on building an ISMS that manages risks across the organisation, while NIST CSF provides functions and categories to assess and improve cybersecurity posture.

 

Geographically, ISO 27001 is used worldwide, including in the UK, Europe and many global supply chains. NIST CSF originated in the United States, particularly for critical infrastructure, but is now used more widely as a reference model.

ISO 27001 vs Cyber Essentials

ISO 27001 is a comprehensive ISMS standard, while Cyber Essentials is a UK government-backed baseline scheme that focuses on a small set of technical controls. ISO 27001 covers governance, risk assessment, controls, monitoring and continual improvement across people, process and technology. Cyber Essentials concentrates on core topics such as secure configuration, access control and patch management.

 

For many UK organisations, Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus is a starting point that demonstrates baseline cyber hygiene to customers or public sector buyers. ISO 27001 certification is a deeper step that requires an ISMS, risk-based control selection and ongoing internal audit.

ISO 27001 vs SOC 2

ISO 27001 is an international management system standard with certification, while SOC 2 is an attestation report based on the AICPA’s Trust Services Criteria, widely used in US markets. ISO 27001 certification assesses whether an organisation’s ISMS meets the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001 for a defined scope. SOC 2 involves an independent auditor reporting on the design and, for Type 2, the operating effectiveness of controls over a period.

 

The choice is often driven by customer expectations and geography. Global or UK based organisations may prioritise ISO 27001 certification, especially where supply chains and tenders reference it. US based customers, particularly in SaaS and cloud services, may request SOC 2 reports instead. Some organisations align with both over time.

Which Information Security Standard Is Right for You?

The right choice depends on your customers, markets and security maturity.

 

Key factors to consider include:

  1. Customer and regulator expectations in your target markets
  2. Whether you need formal certification, a framework for improvement, or both
  3. Existing internal capabilities and the level of change your organisation can support

For many growing UK organisations, ISO 27001 certification offers a structured, internationally recognised ISMS, while frameworks such as NIST CSF and schemes such as Cyber Essentials support internal improvements and UK specific assurance.

 

Many organisations use a GRC platform to centralise their ISMS, controls and evidence, so these standards are easier to run in practice.

Key Differences at a Glance

Standard

Type

Scope and focus

Certification or assurance

Primary audience

Typical effort level

ISO/IEC 27001

Management system standard

Organisation-wide ISMS and risk management

ISO 27001 certification

Global customers, regulators, supply chains

Medium to high

ISO/IEC 27002

Guidance standard

Detailed information security controls

No certification, guidance only

Security teams designing controls

Medium

NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Guidance framework

Cybersecurity functions and categories

No certification, internal assessment

Organisations using NIST as reference

Medium

Cyber Essentials

Baseline assurance scheme

Core technical controls for UK organisations

Cyber Essentials or CE Plus badges

UK buyers, especially public sector

Low to medium

SOC 2

Assurance report (attestation)

Controls for security and related criteria

SOC 2 Type 1 or Type 2 report

US and global SaaS, cloud and service providers

Medium to high

Run ISO 27001 and Other Security Standards in One Place

See how SureCloud helps you manage ISO 27001 alongside frameworks like NIST, Cyber Essentials and SOC 2, without duplicating effort. Centralise your ISMS, map controls across standards, automate evidence collection and maintain continuous readiness as requirements evolve. Reduce manual work, improve visibility and scale your compliance programme with a modern GRC platform built for growing organisations.
Latest articles:
  • Compliance Management

How to Become ISO 27001 Certified: A Step-by-Step UK Guide

  • Compliance Management

The UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill: What It Means in Practice

  • Compliance Management

ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act: How to Comply with Both Frameworks Efficiently

Share this article

FAQ’s

Is ISO 27001 better than Cyber Essentials?

ISO 27001 is not simply better than Cyber Essentials; it serves a different purpose. ISO 27001 is a certifiable ISMS standard that covers governance, risk assessment, controls and continual improvement. Cyber Essentials is a UK baseline scheme focused on a limited set of technical controls. Many UK organisations start with Cyber Essentials to demonstrate basic cyber hygiene, then move to ISO 27001 when customers or growth require broader assurance.

Can ISO 27001 replace NIST?

ISO 27001 does not replace the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, because they play different roles. ISO 27001 is a certifiable management system standard for running an ISMS, while NIST CSF is a guidance framework for assessing and improving cybersecurity posture. Some organisations map ISO 27001 controls to NIST CSF categories, using ISO 27001 certification for formal assurance and NIST CSF for internal reporting.

Do UK organisations need both ISO 27001 and Cyber Essentials?

UK organisations do not always need both, but many use them together. Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus is often requested in UK public sector contracts as proof of baseline controls. ISO 27001 certification demonstrates a broader ISMS and risk management approach recognised internationally. The combination can support UK-specific buyer expectations as well as wider supply chain requirements.

Is SOC 2 equivalent to ISO 27001?

SOC 2 is not equivalent to ISO 27001, although there is overlap in the controls assessed. ISO 27001 is an international ISMS standard, and certification confirms the system meets ISO/IEC 27001 requirements for a defined scope. SOC 2 is an attestation report based on the Trust Services Criteria, covering control design and, for Type 2, operating effectiveness over time. Which one is requested usually depends on customer geography and policy.

More ISO 27001 & SOC 2 Resources

Compliance_3
  • ISO 27001
  • Compliance
  • Third-Party Risk
  • Guide
Beginners Guide to ISO 27001
img-unified-compliance-model@4x
  • DORA
  • ISO 27001
  • NIS2
  • Compliance
  • Blog
DORA vs NIS-2 vs ISO 27001: Where They Overlap & How to Combine Them
ico-fw-soc-2
  • Compliance
  • ISO 27001
  • SOC 2
  • Guide
SOC 2 Compliance Guide
img-cgi-robot 1
  • ISO 27001
  • ISO 27002
  • Third-Party Risk
  • Compliance
  • Guide
The Ultimate Guide to ISO 27002: Expert Insights, Controls & Implementation

“In SureCloud, we’re delighted to have a partner that shares in our values and vision.”

Read more on how Mollie achieved a data-driven approach to risk and compliance with SureCloud.

“In SureCloud, we’re delighted to have a partner that shares in our values and vision.”

Read more on how Mollie achieved a data-driven approach to risk and compliance with SureCloud.

“In SureCloud, we’re delighted to have a partner that shares in our values and vision.”

Read more on how Mollie achieved a data-driven approach to risk and compliance with SureCloud.

Vector
Reviews

Read Our G2 Reviews

4.5 out of 5

"Excellent GRC tooling and professional service"
The functionality within the platform is almost limitless. SureCloud support & project team are very professional and provide great...

Posted on
G2 - SureCloud

5 out of 5

"Great customer support"
The SureCloud team can't do enough to ensure that the software meets our organisation's requirements.

Posted on
G2 - SureCloud

4.5 out of 5

"Solid core product with friendly support team"
We use SureCloud for Risk Management and Control Compliance. The core product is strong, especially in validating data as it is...

Posted on
G2 - SureCloud

4.5 out of 5

"Excellent support team"
We've been happy with the product and the support and communication has been excellent throughout the migration and onboarding process.

Posted on
G2 - SureCloud